INSTRUMENT INTERFERENCES IN SENTENCE ENCODINGCORBETT AT; DOSHER BA.1978; J. VERB. LEARNG VERB. BEHAV.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 17; NO 4; PP. 479-491; BIBL. 19 REF.Article

THE INFLUENCE OF GENERAL AND SPECIFIC VERBAL LABELS ON THE RECOGNITION OF LABELED AND UNLABELED PARTS OF PICTURESJORG S; HORMANN H.1978; J. VERB. LEARNG VERB. BEHAV.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 17; NO 4; PP. 445-454; BIBL. 18 REF.Article

REMEMBERED DURATION: EVIDENCE FOR A CONTEXTUAL-CHANGE HYPOTHESISBLOCK RA; REED MA.1978; J. EXPER. PSYCHOL., HUM. LEARNG MEM.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 4; NO 6; PP. 656-665; BIBL. 23 REF.Article

THE GENERATION EFFECT: DELINEATION OF A PHENOMENONSLAMECKA NJ; GRAF P.1978; J. EXPER. PSYCHOL., HUM. LEARNG MEM.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 4; NO 6; PP. 592-604; BIBL. 23 REF.Article

DETECTING SMALL AMOUNTS OF INFORMATION IN MEMORY: SAVINGS FOR NONRECOGNIZED ITEMSNELSON TO.1978; J. EXPER. PSYCHOL., HUM. LEARNG MEM.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 4; NO 5; PP. 453-468; BIBL. 34 REF.Article

RECOGNITION FAILURE OF RECALLABLE WORDS AND RECOGNIZABLE WORDSWALLACE WP.1978; J. EXPER. PSYCHOL., HUM. LEARNG MEM.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 4; NO 5; PP. 441-452; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

A DEVELOPMENTAL STUDY OF RELATIONS BETWEEN FREE RECALL, CUED RECALL, AND RECALL OF INCIDENTAL MATERIALVON WRIGHT J.1978; SCAND. J. PSYCHOL.; SWE; DA. 1978; VOL. 19; NO 3; PP. 199-203; BIBL. 16 REF.Article